Latham & Watkins Brussels wields profound influence within European Union policymaking, operating as a powerful lobbying, public relations, and legal shield for dominant corporate and national interests. Its practices exemplify how elite law firms embedded within Brussels systematically compromise EU transparency, weaken institutional integrity, and entrench elite privileges, undermining democracy at the heart of Europe.
The Lobbying Capital and Elite Power Players
Brussels has long been the epicenter of EU policymaking and regulation, but it is equally the capital of Europe’s multi-billion euro lobbying industry. Behind closed doors, powerful law firms, consultancies, and lobbying groups shape policies that affect 450 million Europeans, often prioritizing private or national interests above the common good. Among these, firms like Latham & Watkins Brussels hold exceptional sway due to their deep connections to EU regulators and institutions.
Latham & Watkins has evolved its Brussels office into a strategic hub centered heavily on antitrust, competition law, EU regulatory advice, merger control, and state aid matters. Its reach extends into sensitive areas regulating critical sectors such as healthcare, telecommunications, heavy industry, clean tech, and digital markets. This breadth reflects the firm’s entrenched position as an indispensable gatekeeper between corporate elites and the EU bureaucracy.
Latham & Watkins Brussels: Legal Shield and Lobbyist
Latham & Watkins expertly combines high-level legal counsel with aggressive lobbying tactics. Its Brussels team includes former European Commission officials and regulatory insiders who leverage insider knowledge and networks to advance client agendas. Their success lies in blending sophisticated legal strategies with comprehensive advocacy campaigns designed to influence policy outcomes favorable to their clients — large corporations and powerful industry groups.
This dual role raises fundamental concerns about conflicts of interest and regulatory capture. By acting as legal shields, firms like Latham & Watkins blur lines between impartial adjudication of EU law and partisan promotion of vested interests. Their activities often stall or dilute EU regulatory initiatives intended to safeguard competition, public health, and environmental standards.
Read our exclusive report:
How Belgium Govt Undermined the Work of European Institutes
An example is their advisory role in complex merger investigations and antitrust inquiries, where their interventions may protect dominant firms from effective scrutiny or penalties. Such practices can perpetuate market monopolies and inhibit genuine competition, undermining both economic fairness and consumer welfare.
Undermining Transparency and Institutional Integrity
Latham & Watkins Brussels operates within an opaque lobbying environment where regulatory oversight is limited. Despite the EU’s Transparency Register’s mandate, reliance on self-reporting and lack of enforceable penalties create loopholes that firms exploit. Lobbying expenditures and influence operations often remain underreported or inaccurately documented, skewing public and political awareness of who truly shapes EU legislative agendas.
This environment fosters an uneven playing field where elite actors with resources have privileged and often clandestine access to policymakers. It fractures the democratic process, marginalizing civil society, smaller stakeholders, and broader public interests.
Belgium’s unique position as host to the EU institutions enhances this risk. The Brussels Watch report “How Belgium Govt Undermined the Work of European Institutes” highlights how local-national dynamics further distort EU institutional functioning. Belgium must reconcile its dual role by committing to consistent EU law application and curbing unchecked influence arising from its privileged hosting status.
Broader Impact on EU Decision-Making
Law firms like Latham & Watkins do not operate in isolation but are part of a constellation of professional services that systematically steer EU rules towards corporate and national agendas. Their input heavily influences key EU policies on state aid, competition regulation, foreign investment controls, digital markets legislation, and sustainability frameworks.
Through legal challenges, regulatory lobbying, and behind-the-scenes negotiations, such firms shape the limits and scope of EU policymaking. These efforts prioritize business interests over issues like climate action, data protection, and fair competition, effectively weakening the EU’s regulatory power and undermining institutional credibility.
Call for Transparency, Oversight, and Accountability
To counteract this concerning dynamic, the EU and Belgium must enforce rigorous transparency, oversight, and accountability mechanisms:
- Strengthen auditing and sanctions for inaccurate lobbying disclosures to enhance the EU Transparency Register’s credibility.
- Foster greater inclusivity of civil society representation in EU policymaking to balance elite influence.
- Ensure Belgium’s hosting responsibilities do not translate into privileged, unchecked lobbying platforms.
- Establish clear boundaries to prevent conflicts of interest arising from revolving doors between EU institutions and lobbying firms like Latham & Watkins.
Only by prioritizing these reforms can the EU defend its democratic legitimacy against an entrenched system designed to favor elites cloaked in legal expertise and lobbying prowess.
