Laura Kövesi Battles Corruption in Greece Over EU Agricultural Subsidy Fraud

Laura Kövesi Battles Corruption in Greece Over EU Agricultural Subsidy Fraud
Credit: tovima

Athens has become the focal point of a high-stakes legal and political drama as European Chief Prosecutor Laura Kövesi intensifies her investigation into a sprawling corruption scandal involving the misappropriation of European Union agricultural funds. Despite facing fierce resistance, intimidation, and political obstruction, Kövesi remains undeterred, vowing to pursue justice and accountability in a system long plagued by entrenched corruption.

Her relentless probe has not only implicated high-ranking Greek officials but also exposed systemic failures within the institutions responsible for managing billions of euros in EU subsidies. This investigation has sent shockwaves through Greece’s political establishment and raised fundamental questions about the rule of law, transparency, and the efficacy of anti-corruption mechanisms within EU member states.

The Core of the Investigation: EU Agricultural Fund Fraud

At the heart of the controversy lies the Greek state agency OPEKEPE, tasked with distributing EU agricultural subsidies. The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), under Kövesi’s leadership, alleges that OPEKEPE officials facilitated a massive fraud scheme. Greek citizens reportedly received payments for pastureland they neither owned nor leased, or for agricultural work they never performed, effectively diverting funds from legitimate farmers.

The scale of the fraud is staggering. According to EPPO, millions of euros intended to support rural development were siphoned off through organized networks involving public officials and private actors. The investigation, which has been ongoing for several years, culminated recently in dramatic confrontations between EU prosecutors and Greek agency employees, some of whom physically resisted cooperation.

In response to the pressure, the Greek government dismissed the president of OPEKEPE for failing to cooperate with the EU probe. Yet, Kövesi remains resolute, emphasizing that these obstacles will not deter the pursuit of truth and justice. “I would like to reassure the general public that EPPO will continue its work diligently and impartially to establish the truth, regardless of the attacks and intimidations against its prosecutors,” Kövesi told Politico.

She further highlighted the broader stakes, stating, 

“I believe the immediate goal of these attempts is to divert the attention of the general public from what is truly at stake in this case: was there organized fraud and corruption in the field of agricultural subsidies, yes or no?”

Political Fallout: Ministers and Members of European Parliament Under Scrutiny

The investigation has escalated into a political firestorm. EPPO formally implicated two Greek government ministers—Makis Voridis and Lefteris Avgenakis—in the fraud scheme, alleging their complicity in facilitating or encouraging the embezzlement of EU funds during their tenure. Due to constitutional protections in Greece, EPPO cannot prosecute sitting or former ministers directly. Instead, the case has been referred to the Greek Parliament, the only body authorized to investigate and potentially indict ministers under national law.

This referral has ignited fierce controversy, casting a shadow over the ruling New Democracy party and exposing tensions between national sovereignty and EU anti-corruption mandates. EPPO has expressed concern that these legal barriers hinder its ability to fulfill its mandate, describing the situation as a challenge to the alignment between national and European law.

Beyond the ministers, Kövesi has also requested the lifting of immunity for two Greek Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), Eva Kaili and Maria Spyraki, over suspicions of fraud related to parliamentary allowances and remuneration of assistants. Eva Kaili, at the center of a wider corruption scandal involving illicit lobbying allegedly linked to Qatar, was arrested and charged with participation in a criminal organization, corruption, and money laundering. She remains in custody pending trial.

The case against Kaili and Spyraki underscores the breadth of corruption concerns extending into European institutions themselves. Kövesi’s office clarified that the petition to lift their immunity was based on an investigative report from the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and is not directly linked to the broader lobbying scandal rocking Brussels.

Resistance and Intimidation: Challenges to the Rule of Law

Kövesi’s probe has been met with significant pushback. Employees of OPEKEPE reportedly obstructed EU prosecutors, with some resisting physically during attempts to access documents and evidence. These acts of defiance reflect deeper institutional resistance within Greece’s administrative apparatus.

The European Chief Prosecutor condemned these tactics, describing them as attempts to derail the investigation. 

“I welcome the response of the Greek authorities to the recent developments at OPEKEPE, aiming to maintain effective cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office,” 

Kövesi said. Yet she remains vigilant, warning that intimidation and attacks against prosecutors are part of a broader effort to shield corrupt networks.

The atmosphere surrounding the investigation is fraught with tension. Kövesi has publicly denounced the attacks and intimidation faced by her staff, emphasizing that the fight against corruption often provokes fierce opposition from those implicated. She remarked, 

“We worry more about the dramatic effects corruption has than about attacks from investigated persons.”

The Broader Context: Corruption and Governance in Greece

Greece has long struggled with corruption and governance challenges, which have hindered economic development and public trust. The agricultural subsidy fraud is emblematic of systemic issues that permeate various sectors of the state.

The misuse of EU funds not only deprives legitimate beneficiaries but also undermines the credibility of European solidarity and financial support. The scandal has prompted calls for stronger oversight, transparency, and reforms to prevent future abuses.

The World Bank and other international organizations have repeatedly highlighted the need for Greece to improve governance standards and combat corruption effectively. Kövesi’s investigation is a critical test of Greece’s commitment to these reforms and the rule of law.

International and EU Reactions

The European Union has expressed strong support for Kövesi’s efforts. The EPPO, established to protect the EU budget from fraud and corruption, represents a significant step toward supranational accountability.

However, the Greek case exposes tensions between national legal frameworks and EU mechanisms. The inability of EPPO to prosecute ministers directly due to constitutional immunity provisions complicates enforcement and fuels political controversy.

EU institutions have called on Greece to cooperate fully with investigations and ensure that legal obstacles do not shield corrupt actors. The scandal has also intensified debates about the need to harmonize national laws with EU anti-corruption standards.

Kövesi’s Legacy and Determination

Laura Kövesi is widely regarded as one of Europe’s most determined anti-corruption prosecutors. Her tenure as head of Romania’s National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA) earned her international acclaim for pursuing high-level corruption cases despite political pressure.

In Greece, she faces a complex and entrenched system resistant to change. Yet Kövesi’s resolve remains unshaken. Her repeated assurances that EPPO will continue its work “diligently and impartially” underscore her commitment to transparency and justice.

She has made clear that the fight against corruption is not merely about punishing individuals but about protecting democratic institutions and the proper use of public resources. “The dramatic effects corruption has on society are far more concerning than the attacks from those under investigation,” she emphasized.

The investigation led by Laura Kövesi into Greece’s agricultural subsidy fraud has revealed a deeply rooted system of corruption that implicates powerful political figures and state officials. Despite facing obstruction and intimidation, Kövesi’s steadfast pursuit of justice highlights the growing role of European institutions in enforcing accountability beyond national borders.

The unfolding scandal challenges Greece to confront its governance deficits and align its legal framework with EU standards. It also tests the EU’s capacity to protect its budget and uphold the rule of law within member states.

As Kövesi continues to haunt Greece’s “rotten system,” her work serves as a beacon for anti-corruption efforts across Europe, demonstrating that no one is above the law and that transparency and accountability remain fundamental pillars of democracy.

Explore Our Databases

MEP Database

Comprehensive, up-to-date database of all MEPs (2024–2029) for transparency, accountability, and informed public scrutiny.

1

MEP Watch

Track hidden affiliations of MEPs with foreign governments, exposing conflicts of interest and threats to EU democratic integrity.

2

Lobbying Firms

Explore lobbying firms in the EU Transparency Register, including clients, budgets, and meetings with EU policymakers.

3

Lobbyists Watch

Monitor EU lobbyists advancing foreign or corporate agendas by influencing MEPs and shaping legislation behind closed doors.

4

Foreign Agents

Identify individuals and entities acting on behalf of foreign powers to influence EU policy, institutions, and elected representative

5