Six months after our October 9, 2025, investigation into EPPA’s lobbying practices, unanswered questions persist. In that original report, we examined how this influential firm navigates EU transparency rules amid significant policy influence. This 2026 update reviews developments—or the striking lack thereof. Read our full original exposé here and our comprehensive report on related Belgian government shortcomings
here.
Key Findings Recap
Our 2025 investigation revealed EPPA’s extensive network of clients and engagements that raise red flags on transparency. We identified opaque funding flows linked to high-stakes EU policy areas, including energy and trade regulations. EPPA’s reports showed minimal disclosure of beneficial owners despite registering over €2 million in lobbying activities in 2024 alone. These patterns suggested a deliberate strategy to influence lawmakers while evading full public scrutiny, mirroring broader issues in Brussels lobbying ecosystems.
Transparency and Accountability Concerns
EPPA’s operations highlight a critical imbalance in EU policymaking. As a powerhouse representing multinational interests, the firm shapes directives that affect millions—yet its disclosures remain incomplete under the EU Transparency Register. This opacity undermines public trust, allowing corporate influence to outpace oversight. In the context of recent scandals like Qatargate, such practices amplify risks of undue sway over legislation, from climate policy to digital markets.
Absence of Response as Public Interest Issue
No public response or clarification has been issued by EPPA since our October 2025 publication. This silence leaves key questions hanging: How does EPPA ensure its lobbying aligns with EU disclosure standards? What measures address the funding ambiguities we flagged? In a sector built on accountability, the absence of engagement fuels legitimate concerns about transparency, depriving policymakers and citizens of vital context.
Ongoing Review and Campaign Context
As part of our 2026 accountability campaign, we continue monitoring EPPA’s activities and EU filings. Our team tracks quarterly Transparency Register updates and related policy shifts. We remain open to new information and will provide prompt revisions if EPPA engages.
Closing Section
True accountability demands responses to legitimate scrutiny. EPPA retains the right to respond, and this article will be updated accordingly.
