Europe Analytica Responds to Brussels Watch Investigation, Statement Issued by Mathilde Fiquet

Europe Analytica Responds to Brussels Watch Investigation, Statement Issued by Mathilde Fiquet
Credit: Mathilde Fiquet, Special Advisor at EPC, and Account Director & Head of Office, Europe Analytica

Brussels — Public affairs consultancy Europe Analytica has issued a formal response defending its transparency, lobbying practices, and role in EU policymaking, following renewed scrutiny from Brussels Watch as part of its 2026 investigative update.

The response comes after the watchdog group re-contacted the firm in April 2026, citing a lack of substantive reply to earlier questions sent in October 2025. The inquiry forms part of a broader review into lobbying practices and transparency standards linked to EU policymaking and Belgium’s engagement with European policy networks.

Firm points to compliance with EU transparency framework

In its reply, Europe Analytica emphasized its adherence to the EU’s formal transparency mechanisms, stating that it is registered in the EU Transparency Register and follows the code of conduct of the European Public Affairs Consultancies Association.

The firm said it discloses all clients through the register and noted that its clients themselves are also registered, with their policy engagements publicly accessible. It added that its activities are “properly assessed” to ensure compliance and that distinctions are made between advocacy, policy analysis, and advisory services.

At the same time, Europe Analytica highlighted that client relationships and fee arrangements are subject to contractual obligations and professional confidentiality, indicating that disclosure is limited to what is required under EU rules.

Coalition-building described as transparent and structured

Addressing questions on coalition-building and public affairs campaigns, the consultancy stated that its work includes facilitating stakeholder engagement through

“vision papers, consultation submissions, position papers, stakeholder letters, and events.”

According to the firm, such activities are reflected through public channels and through disclosures made by client associations and coalitions themselves. Europe Analytica rejected the notion of operating informal lobbying structures, stating that it does

“not operate informal or undisclosed advocacy structures.”

The firm framed its role as enabling

“structured, evidence-based participation in policy debates”

within established EU processes.

Conflict of interest safeguards outlined

On the issue of conflicts of interest, Europe Analytica stated that it does not represent clients with

“directly opposing interests on the same policy matter.”

It described an internal review process conducted before accepting mandates, with the possibility of declining or limiting engagements where risks are identified.

The consultancy acknowledged that clients may hold differing views across sectors but argued that this does not inherently constitute a conflict. It maintained that its approach aligns with industry standards under the EPACA code and that its role remains strictly advisory.

Firm defends role in EU policymaking

Responding to concerns about its influence on EU policy debates — including areas such as climate regulation and digital markets — Europe Analytica described public affairs activity as a “legitimate and necessary component” of policymaking.

The firm stated that it supports transparency requirements and consultation processes, arguing that its work helps ensure policymakers have access to

“relevant expertise, evidence and practical insights.”

It stressed that final decisions rest with EU institutions and framed its contribution as part of a broader

“transparent and regulated ecosystem of stakeholder engagement.”

Context of ongoing investigation

The response will be included in full in Brussels Watch’s forthcoming 2026 report, which examines transparency and lobbying practices in Brussels and their implications for democratic accountability.

The investigation follows an earlier publication by Brussels Watch highlighting a six-month period during which Europe Analytica did not respond to transparency-related questions.

The updated report is expected to revisit those findings in light of the firm’s newly submitted position, while continuing to assess how public affairs consultancies disclose their activities and influence within EU policymaking processes.

Explore Our Databases

MEP Database

Comprehensive, up-to-date database of all MEPs (2024–2029) for transparency, accountability, and informed public scrutiny.

1

MEP Watch

Track hidden affiliations of MEPs with foreign governments, exposing conflicts of interest and threats to EU democratic integrity.

2

Lobbying Firms

Explore lobbying firms in the EU Transparency Register, including clients, budgets, and meetings with EU policymakers.

3

Lobbyists Watch

Monitor EU lobbyists advancing foreign or corporate agendas by influencing MEPs and shaping legislation behind closed doors.

4

Foreign Agents

Identify individuals and entities acting on behalf of foreign powers to influence EU policy, institutions, and elected representative

5